La libreta del hambre
We run various sites in defense of human rights and need support to pay for more powerful servers. Thank you.
Recent Comments

    Book is bad, but ban it?

    The Miami-Dade School Board wants a book out of its libraries
    because it paints a rosy picture of life in Cuba. Not so fast, others say.

    By DAVID ADAMS, Times Latin America Correspondent
    Published July 4, 2006

    MIAMI — When it comes to teaching schoolkids about Cuba, what do you
    tell a 5-year-old?

    Do little ones need to know about food rationing and the rigors of the
    communist education system? Or will smiling faces and sunny beaches suffice?

    After what they went through to leave the island, some Cuban-American
    parents feel passionately that their children should be taught the
    unvarnished truth of how difficult life can be there.

    Others say that dictating what children learn about Cuba is something
    worthy of Fidel Castro; it’s just not the American way.

    The story has unfolded in another, classically American way: The
    Miami-Dade School Board decided a book in the county’s school libraries
    painted too rosy a picture of life on the communist-run island and
    ordered it removed. And the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit.


    The 32-page book, A Visit to Cuba, is meant for students in kindergarten
    through second grade. It sat on library shelves for years until earlier
    this year, when a parent, Juan Amador, raised an objection at a School
    Board meeting.

    A former political prisoner in Cuba, Amador says his attention was drawn
    after his daughter brought the book home from school. He complained that
    the book — the Spanish version is called Vamos a Cuba — did not
    accurately depict life in Fidel Castro’s Cuba, at least as he knew it.

    “The Cuban people have been paying a dear price for 47 years for the
    reality to be known,” Amador told reporters.

    The School Board’s staff said the book should not be removed: In a 16-1
    vote, the board’s review committee governing school materials
    recommended against taking the book off the shelves. The board’s
    attorney also argued against the ban, warning that members could be
    legally exposed if the court determines they acted for political — not
    educational — reasons.

    The board disregarded its own staff and lawyer. Last month, in a 6-3
    vote along ethnic lines, Hispanic members of the board deemed the book

    Was politics behind the vote?

    Frank Bolanos is the School Board’s most outspoken critic of the book.
    He also is running for a seat in Tallahassee against Alex Villalobos,
    the former Miami Cuban darling of the Republican-controlled state Senate.

    Three other board members who voted against the book are running for
    re-election to the board.

    The board’s decision not only banned the Cuba book, it also ordered the
    removal of 20 other books in the series, featuring a wide range of

    The ACLU lawsuit contends that the School Board exceeded its authority,
    violated its own procedures and failed to provide proper legal grounds
    for ordering the book removed.

    “The Miami-Dade School Board’s decision to defy U.S. law prohibiting
    censorship … is a slap in the face to our tradition of free speech,”
    said JoNel Newman, an attorney for the ACLU.

    Already facing public ridicule, even from more open-minded Miami Cubans,
    the School Board is facing the embarrassing prospect of being taught a
    lesson by its own students, who joined the ACLU lawsuit.

    Analysts say the board’s decision seems unlikely to hold up in court.
    While public school teachers enjoy a good deal of latitude in the
    classroom, different rules apply in libraries, according to William
    Zieske, a Chicago lawyer specializing in library issues. “The U.S.
    Supreme Court sees the public school library as an area of private
    inquiry where students have more rights,” he said.

    In the last similar book censure case, the Supreme Court ruled in 1982
    that school boards did not exercise “absolute discretion” over school
    library books, except where content might be deemed “vulgar” or
    “educationally unsuitable.” Students also enjoyed a First Amendment
    right to access to information, the court ruled.

    “That’s still the law of the land,” said Howard Simon, executive
    director of the Miami chapter of the ACLU. “Books cannot be removed
    because of objection to content.”


    Most everyone seems to agree that A Visit to Cuba is a lousy book. To
    keep the language simple for small children, it ends up spouting a
    series of fairly misleading generalities. Among these literary gems is
    the sentence:

    “People in Cuba eat, work, and go to school like you do.”

    The book’s cover shows happy-as-can-be schoolchildren dressed in the
    less jolly uniform of the Pioneers, a Communist Party organization to
    which all students must belong. It also blithely describes how Cubans
    enjoy eating “chicken with rice,” while Cuba’s beaches “are good for
    swimming and boating.”

    Cuban-Americans can be forgiven for finding such comments offensive, if
    not laughable. Chicken is a rare delicacy for most Cubans. Its best
    beaches are limited to tourists. Boating for pleasure isn’t what Cuban
    rafters had in mind when they set off for Florida in the tens of
    thousands in the 1990s.

    When the issue of whether to remove the book came before the School
    Board, several board members spoke out in support of Amador.

    “This book should never have been allowed to be inserted in our public
    school libraries,” Bolanos said. Barely hiding a political agenda, he
    warned board members that they faced a choice of voting “with the Cuban
    community (or) … against the Cuban community.”

    But others board members opposed removing the book and complained of
    political pressures. Many in the Cuban community have since come out
    against Bolanos, describing his efforts to get the book removed as
    dictatorial politics worthy of Castro himself.

    “It is perfectly possible to come from a family that suffered terrible
    losses in the Cuban revolution and be opposed to the banning of a
    children’s book. The one has nothing to do with the other,” Ana
    Menendez, a Cuban-American columnist, wrote in the Miami Herald.

    The political climate around the meeting reminded some participants of
    the Cold War days when anything in Miami that smacked of communism
    aroused the ire of some Cuban-Americans.

    “It was very heated, pretty frightening,” said Ronald Bilbao, 18, past
    president of the Student Government Association who sat on the review
    committee and was hissed at. Bilbao said he found the book offensive,
    “but that’s beside the point. You don’t ban books in America, period.”

    For now, at least, A Visit to Cuba remains on the library shelves. The
    ACLU scored an early victory in court last week when a judge asked the
    School Board to leave the books alone until he makes his ruling.

    Meantime, the ACLU is suggesting a simple solution. Instead of removing
    A Visit to Cuba, it suggests books offering different perspectives about
    the island should be added to shelves.

    “The answer to speech and books that you don’t like,” said Simon, “is
    more speech and not censorship.”

    David Adams can be contacted at

    [Last modified July 4, 2006, 22:11:34]

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    July 2006
    M T W T F S S
    « Jun   Aug »