La libreta del hambre
We run various sites in defense of human rights and need support to pay for more powerful servers. Thank you.
Recent Comments

    Hunger: Where Is The Scorn?

    INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY

    Posted 3/29/2007

    Food Security: There's never a shortage of dictators to hurl abuse at
    the U.S. for its food policies. But they have no right to do it.
    Marxism, not freedom, is the world's foremost creator of hunger.

    The blame-America-first crowd often zeroes in on U.S. plenty, calling
    our lack of want 'excess' and our great food productivity an ecological
    evil.

    There's been a malevolent new wave of this lately as more news of failed
    Marxist regimes and the hunger they create comes out.

    Cuba's communist dictator Fidel Castro on Thursday denounced the U.S.'
    production of grain ethanol as 'sinister' and a coming cause of
    ecological catastrophe and global starvation. Not only would it affect
    Cuba, which has rationed food since 1962, but 3 billion other people, he
    said.

    Not to be outdone, the United Nations denounced the West for North
    Korea's new famine, laughably claiming the nuclear-armed state was a
    victim of bad harvests and a lack of food aid from the stingy West.

    Meanwhile, in Zimbabwe, the West is regularly denounced as the culprit
    for conspiring to keep food off the African nation's shelves even as its
    offers of genetically modified food aid have been rejected.

    Dictator Robert Mugabe's enemy isn't hunger itself, but improved food
    production from the green revolution, developed in an atmosphere of
    freedom and capitalism.

    By the way, all three Marxist states claim food is a right for all. But
    the hunger their people suffer is in fact just another monstrous
    instance of state failure. In all three, private property is outlawed
    and expropriated.

    The people who don't escape have no means of bettering themselves under
    state control. They live as serfs, as land goes fallow. While wielding
    absolute power, all three states fail to provide even the most basic
    needs of their citizens. They are the causes of hunger in the world.

    But which of them are held up to world scorn for their awful behavior?
    Which are held responsible for creating terror and starvation in their
    own lands, even as they demand bailouts from the free countries they curse?

    Where is the U.N. report denouncing North Korea, Zimbabwe or Cuba for
    policies that create mass starvation, all because they refuse to permit
    any free-market activity even if it means saving their citizens' lives?

    Castro, whose ruined nation shipped $780 million worth of vegetables,
    sugar and agricultural exports to the U.S. in the 1950s, has turned his
    nation into a lunar wasteland over his 48-year dictatorship, its famous
    sugar industry now gone. Does Castro take responsibility? No. He blames
    global warming, not his disastrous decisions.

    But Cuba's land lies in ruin not because of bad weather but because its
    massive propaganda-driven 'great sugar harvests' of the 1960s ruined the
    land in the name of making Castro's arbitrary quota — and because no
    citizen can own or trade land for its most efficient use. Now, Cuba
    grows so little food it must import it from the very nation its leader
    denounces and undermines and blames.

    In fact, it's Castro's dirty secret: The U.S. is Cuba's food lifeline.
    The U.S. sells $340 million in food a year to Cuba just so its ration
    books can be worth the paper they're printed on.

    The U.S. is Cuba's top trade partner, but Cuba ranks only 32nd on the
    U.S. list. America grows enough food to feed dozens of countries and,
    through ethanol, its own cars.

    'Prior to 1959, when Castro took power, Cuba had the fourth-highest
    protein consumption in the Western Hemisphere,' says Humberto Fontova,
    author of 'Fidel: Hollywood's Favorite Tyrant.' 'Today, it's near the
    bottom.'

    According to a Spanish study, Fontova said, in 1842 Cuba's plantation
    slaves got royally decreed daily rations of 8 ounces of meat, 4 ounces
    of rice, 16 ounces of starch and 4 ounces of beans. By contrast, when
    Castro started rationing food in 1962, Cubans got 2 ounces of meat, 3
    ounces of rice, 6.5 ounces of starch and 1 ounce of beans.

    'Yet (Newsweek's) Eleanor Clift will tell us that to be poor in Cuba is
    better than to be poor in the U.S.,' Fontova said — a claim Clift made,
    he says, on TV's 'The McLaughlin Group' during the Elian Gonzalez debacle.

    Meanwhile, the U.N. blames the West for not feeding North Korea —
    missing the problem of Marxist state control that would make food
    impossible to produce no matter how good the weather.

    The world is 'losing the fight against hunger' in North Korea, a U.N.
    official said, without even a wayward glance at the dictatorship that
    caused all this misery.

    Somehow Singapore and Hong Kong, two Asian states which grow no food
    either, manage to avoid famine.

    The difference is they produce value from their free minds and their
    industry under capitalist incentives, with governments that don't seek
    to control all economic activity. There's plenty of food, and virtually
    no hunger, in both city-states.

    This all boils down to state control. What we want to know from the U.N.
    is what dictatorship can claim a right to rule a country, making all
    decisions for its citizens, with no responsibility to feed them?

    http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1501&status=article&id=260062630759326

    Tags: , , , , , , , ,

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Calendar
    March 2007
    M T W T F S S
    « Feb   Apr »
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
    Archives