La libreta del hambre
We run various sites in defense of human rights and need support to pay for more powerful servers. Thank you.
Recent Comments

    Obama and Cuban myths debunked
    YESENIA FERNÁNDEZ SELIER | Nueva York | 5 Abr 2016 – 12:30 pm.

    Without any shots, threats or military invasions, the US’s 44th
    president, Barack Hussein Obama, arrived in and departed from Cuba.
    Cubans all over were glued to their screens, engaging in the inevitable
    debate about his visit’s motivations and, more recently, its effects.
    Beyond the images and speeches, the end of antagonism with the “restless
    and brutal north” has rattled, like an invisible earthquake, the myths
    upon which our national narratives have been based. Among them: Cuba-US
    relations and the role assigned to non-whites in the national ideology,
    and the coalition under which the nation has been defined.

    Cuban patriots, from Saco to the Castros, have understood our proximity
    to the United States as the crux of our political and economic destiny.
    Panic about the island becoming another Haiti, along with the criollo
    elite’s aspirations for greater commercial and freedoms, made an
    alliance with the north attractive to 19th-century Cuban capitalists.
    The US stood out as a beacon of modernity in the industrialized world,
    while the Spanish Empire was faltering, the Latin American nations
    independent and exhibiting a resentful spite for new forms of dissent,
    internal and external.

    The wars of independence and the first great Cuban exodus to the US led
    to an understanding of the specific possibilities and threats posed by
    the growing empire. The threat was fully manifested by the US invasion
    of 1898, and the interventionist guarantee embodied by the Platt
    Amendment in 1901. Protests by patriots like Juan Gualberto Gómez,
    Enrique José Varona, Rubén Martínez Villena and Julio Antonio Mella
    bolstered the anti-imperialist school of thought founded by José Martí.

    The invocation of this anti-imperialist tradition has been vital to the
    nationalist narrative of the Cuban revolution, and instrumental in
    galvanizing an international coalition with the socialist camp,
    liberation movements in Africa, and the international Left.

    But now the north has landed at Jose Martí airport. The absence of Raúl
    Castro at the foot of the ladder which Obama descended illustrated the
    tensions under which vessel of reconciliation has set sail. Much to the
    dismay of my former professor of Defense Preparedness, the island did
    not run for shelter. Despite the joint “securities,” the people flooded
    the streets and crowded at their windows and balconies, overcome with
    unbridled joy and emotion. Thus far Obama’s doctrine towards Cuba
    appears to have suspended the interventionism endorsed by the Monroe
    Doctrine. Under a charismatic aura of diplomacy, the new “soft power” is
    obviously rooted in more subtle and responsive reasoning, one stemming
    from geopolitics and contemporary capitalism. Our nationalist rhetoric
    was not prepared for this. And Barack Hussein Obama forges ahead,
    unflappable, despite our demands, our crises and our political insults.

    Obama has been dealing with the scrutiny of his detractors ever since
    the commencement of his candidacy for the presidency. There has been
    plenty of racism, with his ability to govern being called into question,
    an affiliation with Islam being alleged, and the veracity of his birth
    certificate being questioned. Inaugurated as the president of the most
    powerful nation on earth, his rhetoric on the matter has been contained,
    but this has cannot be said of his vision. The first family has
    projected an impeccable image of respectability, without sacrificing
    their identification with the US’s black culture and the Diaspora. As a
    newcomer to the White House, and not without controversy, Obama replaced
    the bust of Winston Churchill for one of Martin Luther King. At numerous
    social galas, not only have the Obamas celebrated the excellence of
    black painters, musicians and dancers, but have made doing so
    politically fashionable.

    The Obama family’s decolonizing efforts could not have been complete
    without visiting Cuba, where the political castration of blacks has been
    part and parcel of the national education program. Blacks created wealth
    for white criollos, wielded machetes against the Spaniards, and were
    butchered in still unknown numbers in 1906 and in 1912, closing with
    blood a century of struggle for civil rights in the framework of the
    nation. And the alleged eradication of racism under the revolutionary
    doctrine has not prevented the black man, as a figure, from remaining a
    symbol of barbarism, ignorance and national ridicule.

    Inside and outside Cuba the aggrieved used Obama’s black body to exhibit
    their criollo class of racism, and we saw him parading in memes and
    cartoons as the rumba-dancing black, the black musician, the black
    congo, and the black coachman. Racist caricatures remain commonplace
    forms of offense, as we were recently reminded by an article in the
    Tribuna de La Habana “Negro, tú eres sueco?” [“Blackie, are you Swedish?”]

    Fortunately, Obama does not need a Swedish passport to shop at a very
    expensive boutique, as he simply embodies the power of the most powerful
    empire on earth. However, all that power could not conceal his
    down-to-earth nature. His controversial and informal “Qué volá” (How are
    you?) left an amicable echo wafting through the air of the city’s most
    run-down neighborhoods, those harboring most of the black population.
    Obama danced the tango in Argentina, but did not dance in Cuba, nor
    smoke cigars. Instead, he visited a family restaurant owned by a black
    family, poorly represented in the new middle class, and called for
    greater participation by Afro-Cubans in the new economic plans.

    According to the tenets of criollo racism, a Cuban mulatto would not go
    to Harvard to marry a poor woman darker than himself. Obama, according
    to this perverse logic, is at least a paradoxical mulatto, which in
    English calls us to a new national coalition. Through Babalú, St.
    Lazarus, Jesus Christ and the divine intervention of the Holy Father,
    the 44th US President appeals to older and perhaps more appealing
    beliefs than political ones. No wonder Marx called it “the opium of the
    masses.” According to the Obama Doctrine, with that opium it is possible
    to establish a new, imagined community, a new brotherhood with more
    affinities than differences, with more affection and less rancor. Since
    its first tweet, or his choosing an eatery in a humble neighborhood to
    have dinner with his family, it was clear that he was more interested in
    the people than protocol. So, he sat down at the table of the comedian
    Pánfilo, a character associated with rationing cards, to play dominoes
    and let him win.

    Obama’s political jujitsu, with his speeches in Havana, featured a range
    of appeals calling for a New Cuba. His own personal history demonstrated
    by itself the need for protest and dissent. “When my parents met they
    could not have married in many states in my own country. But, thanks to
    dissenters like Martin Luther King and others, I have been able to
    become the US president.” His unhesitant inclusion of Cuba’s exiles and
    dissidents as necessary and indispensable players in the nation’s future
    unfortunately puts to shame a regime that has buried its humanity under
    slogans and uniforms.

    Source: Obama and Cuban myths debunked | Diario de Cuba –

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    April 2016
    M T W T F S S
    « Mar   May »